Home Blog

MALAYSIAN INTERNATIONAL COCOA FAIR (MICF) 2025 PRE-LAUNCH AND MEDIA SESSION

0
MALAYSIAN INTERNATIONAL COCOA FAIR (MICF) 2025 PRE-LAUNCH AND MEDIA SESSION


“MyCocoa Delight: Indulge, Meet & Connect”
KOTA KINABALU, Malaysia, Jan. 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — The Malaysian International Cocoa Fair (MICF) 2025 will be held for the first time in Sabah from May 24 to May 27, 2025, at the Sabah International Convention Centre (SICC). The pre-launch ceremony was officiated by YB Datuk Chan Foong Hin, Deputy Minister of Plantation and Commodities, at the Hilton Hotel, Kota Kinabalu.

YB Datuk Chan Foong Hin and Director General of the Malaysian Cocoa Board, Datuk Dr. Ramle Hj Kasin, together with industry leaders on stage at the Pre-Launch Ceremony of MICF 2025, marking a significant journey towards global recognition of the nation’s cocoa industry.

According to YB Datuk Chan, Sabah was chosen as the location for MICF 2025 due to its critical role in Malaysia’s cocoa industry, contributing 60% of the country’s total cocoa production. He emphasized that MICF 2025 serves as a platform to promote Malaysia’s cocoa internationally, discuss key industry issues, and strengthen global collaboration in the sector.
With the theme “MyCocoa Delight: Indulge, Meet & Connect,” MICF 2025 will feature a variety of activities, including:

Cocoa Product Exhibition: Introducing innovations from local and global producers, including premium and artisanal chocolates.
International Conference: Discussing cocoa processing technology, premium cocoa production, and global market trends.
Business Networking Program: Creating collaboration opportunities for industry players.
Field Visits: Offering participants an understanding of the cocoa value chain.

YBhg. Datuk Dr. Ramle Hj Kasin, Director-General of the Malaysian Cocoa Board (MCB), announced the three main components of MICF 2025: Malaysian International Cocoa Conference (MICC), Malaysian International Cocoa Exhibition (MICE), and Malaysian International Cocoa Dinner (MICD). The event is expected to draw over 1,000 conference participants, 25,000 trade and public visitors, and more than 100 exhibitors from around the globe.
YB Datuk Chan also highlighted Malaysia’s potential, particularly Sabah, to reclaim its position as a leading cocoa cultivation hub in Asia. He stated, “Sabah was once a major player in cocoa production, and now, with cocoa prices at a historic high, we have an opportunity to revitalize this industry.”
MICF 2025 not only emphasizes the development of the cocoa sector but also provides an opportunity for tourists to explore the natural beauty of Sabah. Visitors can enjoy attractions such as Mount Kinabalu, pristine islands, and local cultural experiences, making MICF 2025 a unique blend of trade and tourism.
Supported by international organizations like the International Cocoa Organization (ICCO) and the Cocoa Association of Asia (CAA), MICF 2025 aims to establish Malaysia as a regional cocoa hub and strengthen the country’s position in the global market.
 

AI is helping firms feel optmistic in 2025, but lack of skills is not helping

0
Manager is verifying the validity, security, approving requests, quality assurance, investment contracts. Online digital document work, paperless office. online survey. Checking mark up on check boxes


More businesses are optimistic about 2025 compared with 2023Cash, skills shortages and trade wars are all causes for concernThree in four leaders see AI as a top-three priority technologyThree in five (62%) global business leaders are optimistic about their organization’s outlook this year, which is an six percentage point increase over 2023, new research from Capgemini has revealed.In the year ahead, companies are set to continue investing in new projects despite market uncertainty, with exactly half of global organizations set to up their spending, its report found.Despite the initially positive outlook, some key hurdles remain. Thankfully, though, they are many ofthe same hurdles businesses have been facing for several years, which puts them in good stead to overcome them.Business optimism is climbingTop investment areas for 2025 include customer experience, engineering, research and development, innovation, and supply chain transformation, with artificial intelligence set to revolutionize each of these areas.That said, troubling economic conditions continue to restrict the free flow of cash – 56% are planning to reduce costs even further, rather than grow revenue in order to tackle limited funds.The ongoing skills shortage also continues to present its own challenges, with three in five (61%) UK leaders citing tech skills shortages as a competitive barrier, even though they want to increase investments in tech by up to 13% this year.Newer challenges are also bubbling to the surface, with four in five businesses seeking to diversify supply chains in order to reduce their reliance on China amid the US-China trade war that continues to play out – nearly three-quarters are now worried about potential trade tariffs and other measures.Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!“As we look to 2025, business leaders are navigating uncertainty with an attitude of confidence and resilience – two qualities that our research shows they are looking to instill in their organizations through technology investment,” noted Capgemini CEO Aiman Ezzat.Looking ahead, three in four execs globally ranked AI in their top three priority technologies for the year ahead, with the tech showing now signs of slowing down.You might also like

Sungrow Hydrogen Won The Largest Supply Contract For The 320MW Green Ammonia Project In Oman!

0
Sungrow Hydrogen won the largest supply contract for the 320MW green ammonia project in Oman!


HEFEI, China, Jan. 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — On January 18th, Sungrow Hydrogen signed supply agreement with ACME Group and will provide water electrolysis hydrogen production equipment for the 320MW green ammonia project in Oman. It also marks the official start of the cooperation between ACME Group and Sungrow Hydrogen in the Middle East.

Signing ceremony between ACME Group and Sungrow Hydrogen

According to the agreement, Sungrow Hydrogen will provide multiple sets of 1000Nm³/h ALK hydrogen production equipment and flexible green hydrogen production solutions for the project. The delivery will be completed within 2025.
The project is the core part of ACME’s green energy strategy in the Middle East is anticipated to begin operations in 2026. Upon commencement, the initial capacity for green ammonia production will be 300 tonnes per day. Undoubtedly, it has the potential to greatly strengthen Oman’s position in the global green hydrogen industry in the future.
Sungrow Hydrogen’s competitiveness in the global green hydrogen industry is on the rise. In 2024, its electrolyzer products were set to receive prestigious certifications from CE and TÜV and its 20MW Water Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Empirical Platform (the largest one worldwide) has been granted with Laboratory Accreditation Certificate by China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS). Additionally, Plant No.2 of the Sungrow Hydrogen Intelligent Manufacturing Centre has recently become operational. This facility features China’s first automated assembly line for ALK electrolyzers, which is expected to boost production efficiency by 60%. As a result, Sungrow Hydrogen’s annual production capacity has now increased to 3GW.
With advanced technology and efficient service, Sungrow Hydrogen actively participates in multiple large-scale integrated green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol demonstration projects worldwide. In the future, Sungrow Hydrogen will continue to collaborate with global partners to jointly advance the development of green hydrogen projects, powering up the global green hydrogen industry.

 

OPPO teases Find N5’s unreal thinness & unexpected water resistance

0
OPPO teases Find N5's unreal thinness & unexpected water resistance

The OPPO Find N5 will become the world’s thinnest foldable, as per OPPO’s CEO. Its thinness appeared online before, and now the chief of OPPO Find series, Zhou Yibao, has decided to add more fuel to the fire. He shared images that tease the Find N5’s unreal thinness, while an unexpected water rating has also been reaveled.
The OPPO Find N5 will offer unreal thinness and unexpected water resistance rating
If you check out the four images in the gallery below, you’ll see what we’re dealing with. The phone, in its unfolded form, is stacked next to two coins, four credit cards, and an iPhone. Needless to say, it will be immensely thin.

The coins and credit cards are very revealing, but the fact that this phone will essentially be half the thickness of the iPhone (we’re presuming that the iPhone 16 Pro or Pro Max are used here), is truly stunning.
If we do some math, that puts its thickness when unfolded at 3.5-4mm. As a reminder, the HONOR Magic V3 is the thinnest book-style foldable these days, it’s 4.35mm thick when unfolded. The OPPO Find N3 aka OnePlus Open, is 5.8mm thick when unfolded. So this will be quite the difference.
All of this points to true thinness when folded too
Considering how thin the phone will be when unfolded, it can’t exactly be thick when folded either, can it? That phone will definitely feel like a regular slab phone in the hand when folded.
Another detail that Yibao revealed is the phone’s water rating. As a reminder, the OPPO Find N3 aka OnePlus Open offered only IPX4 rating for splash resistance. Well, the OPPO Find N5 will arrive with an IPX8 and IPX9 certification.
In other words, that means that this phone will become the only foldable to offer protection against high temperature and pressure water jets. Needless to say, that’s quite surprising, but certainly a welcomed addition.
The OPPO Find N5 will become official next month, though we still don’t know the exact date.

Why IPads Stand Out | Premium Build, Powerful Processors & More

0
Why IPads Stand Out | Premium Build, Powerful Processors & More

Tablets have become indispensable for work, entertainment, and creativity, offering versatility in a portable package. Among the myriad of options available, Apple’s iPads consistently lead the market, renowned for their premium design, seamless performance, and robust ecosystem. iPads remain a favorite for their unmatched reliability and long-term value. Here are five key reasons why iPads stand out in the crowded tablet market.

Why iPads stand out?

1. Premium Build Quality

One of the key reasons why iPads stand out is their premium build quality. Apple ensures every iPad, from the base model to the high-end iPad Pro, features a sleek aluminum body that feels both sturdy and luxurious. Unlike most Android tablets, where premium materials are reserved for flagship models, Apple maintains this quality across its entire lineup. This consistency in design and build is a major factor for Apple’s reign in the tablet market.

2. Regular and Long-Term Software Updates

Another reason why iPads stand out is Apple’s commitment to regular and long-term software updates. These updates not only keep the devices secure but also introduce new features that enhance the user experience. While Android tablets often struggle with short-lived update cycles, Apple provides years of reliable support, ensuring that even older iPads remain functional and up-to-date. This long-term support is a crucial aspect of why iPads stand out among competitors.

3. Seamless Ecosystem Integration

The seamless integration within Apple’s ecosystem is a significant factor on why people favor ipads. Features like Handoff, AirDrop, and Universal Control make multitasking across Apple devices effortless. Whether you’re transferring files, continuing tasks, or using the same peripherals across devices, iPads work flawlessly with iPhones, Macs, and Apple Watches. While Android has made progress in cross-device connectivity, Apple’s ecosystem remains a prime example of why iPads stand out.

4. Top-Tier Performance

Performance is yet another reason why iPads stand out in the tablet market. Apple’s custom A-series and M-series processors deliver exceptional speed and efficiency. Whether you need a tablet for everyday tasks, gaming, or professional work like video editing, there’s an iPad to suit your needs. This powerful performance ensures why iPads stand out when compared to other tablets, many of which lack the same level of hardware optimization.

5. Better Resale Value

The resale value of iPads is a testament to why iPads stand out as a long-term investment. Thanks to their premium build, regular software updates, and Apple’s brand reputation, iPads retain their value far better than most Android tablets. Selling a well-maintained iPad can significantly offset the cost of upgrading, which is another reason why iPads stand out for budget-conscious users looking for a durable and reliable device.

Conclusion

From premium build quality to top-tier performance, it’s easy to see why iPads stand out in the tablet market. Their seamless integration within Apple’s ecosystem, years of software support, and better resale value make them a preferred choice for users worldwide. While Android tablets are catching up in certain areas, the unmatched reliability, quality, and longevity of iPads consistently show why iPads stand out as the top option for both casual and professional users alike.

iOS 19 leak shows off visionOS-inspired Camera app redesign

0
iOS 19 redesigned Camera app concept

TL;DR

According to a YouTuber, iOS 19 will overhaul the Camera app by adopting glassy UI elements resembling visionOS.
He also suggests that the design language could extend to other parts of the system, such as the home screen and other first-party apps.
Apple will likely unveil iOS 19 during WWDC25 in June and release the OS update to all users in September.

Last year, a rumor stated that iOS 18 would overhaul the built-in Camera app and introduce a visionOS-like design. That did not materialize, though. A different source is now making a similar claim, declaring that the Apple Camera app on iOS 19 would adopt the alleged translucent UI.

YouTube channel Front Page Tech claims to have viewed a verified video of the never-before-seen iOS 19, showcasing a completely redesigned Camera app. The new look mirrors visionOS, featuring glassy buttons and round icons. While the YouTuber hasn’t shared the leaked video itself, he allegedly created a comparable mockup based on the real deal.Beyond the revamped Camera app, Front Page Tech suggests that the translucent user interface could expand to more parts of iOS 19, including the home screen and other Apple applications. However, such a significant change is unlikely to occur through a single OS update, as credible reports indicate that Apple is already struggling to develop announced features on time.iOS 19 beta will likely debut to registered developers during WWDC25 in June. If Apple sticks to its release schedule, users with compatible iPhone models can expect the public launch towards mid-September. Besides the questionable Camera leak, iOS 19 is rumored to introduce more Apple Intelligence features. These could include a smarter Siri that can handle more complex queries like ChatGPT.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com. You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it’s your choice.Comments

Audioengine’s B1 Next Gen Bluetooth Receiver Adds Bluetooth AptX Adaptive Support to Vintage Amps

0
Audioengine Next Gen B1 Bluetooth Music Receiver

Talk about being ahead of the curve…back in 2014. Audioengine’s B1 Bluetooth Receiver has been around for over a decade and it was definitely time for an updated version of the best-selling product. The new Audioengine B1 Next Gen Music Bluetooth Receiver looks and feels a lot like its predecessor on the outside; all of the changes are internal and they have managed to keep the price at $189.

Just like the original B1, the B1 Next Gen Bluetooth Music Receiver is targeted at those who have older audio systems and would like to add streaming capability via Bluetooth. Just connect the digital or analog audio output of the B1 Next Gen to a compatible input on your system and you are set to go.

The B1 Next Gen incorporates Bluetooth 5.3 with support for Qualcomm’s aptX Adaptive codec. This combination can receive music from any compatible Bluetooth source (such as a smartphone) from up to 100 feet away, without being subject to interruptions and dropouts; although we think that manufacturers need to stop claiming this because internal walls and house construction definitely impact the signal strength.

Audioengine Next Gen B1 Bluetooth Music Receiver Front and Back

Dynamic Audio Quality

Bluetooth 5.3 with aptX Adaptive can adjust the bit rate dynamically to deliver the best audio performance based on wireless conditions.

Similar to how a GPS adjusts traffic routes, aptX Adaptive adjusts to changing wireless conditions to provide the best possible audio quality while maintaining a stable connection. 

Upgraded Internal DAC

For optimal playback sound quality, the B1 Nextgen included an ESS-9018K2M DAC chip (an upgrade from the AKM 4396) which upsamples audio to 32-bit/96 kHz, providing improved clarity and detail.

Before you chime in with “32-bit/96kHz” isn’t as good enough — please remind yourself what percentage of the music on your phone, tablet, or laptop is over 24-bit/96kHz — let alone 16-bit/44.1kHz.

99% of the people who will consider the B1 Next Gen BT receiver, will be using an Android smartphone or iPhone and streaming from Spotify, TIDAL, Qobuz, Apple Music or Amazon Music HD and adding a 32-bit DAC to their legacy devices like an older amplifier will be a major step-up.

USB-C

In addition to Bluetooth, you can also access hi-res audio via a direct USB-C physical connection. You can physically connect your smartphone, tablet, or even a PC for an enhanced listening experience on your old gear.

Audioengine Next Gen B1 Bluetooth Music Receiver atop Sony A/V Receiver

Hi-Resolution Wireless Bridge

When connected to a system that doesn’t currently have its own Bluetooth or wireless streaming capability, the Next Gen functions as a wireless bridge between your phone or other streaming device and your traditional stereo, preamp, or external DAC.

No additional apps, passwords, or network setups are required. Anything that is required is handled by your wireless or wired source.  
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

From Nate Rodriguez, CEO of Audioengine: “Our commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction drives us to continually enhance our products. The updated B1 Bluetooth Audio Receiver with Bluetooth 5.3, aptX Adaptive and 32-bit audio gives our customers the freedom to upgrade their stereo receiver to stream via Bluetooth with incredible clarity”.

Comparison

Pro Tip: The B1 Next Gen and B1 have the same external appearance.

B1 Next Gen  (2025)B1 (2014)Price:$189$189 (discontinued)Bluetooth5.3 with aptX AdaptiveVersion not indicated with aptX, A2DP, and AVRCPConstructionAnodized AluminumAnodized AluminumDACESS-9018K2M DAC 32-bit/96kHzAKM AK4396 DAC 24bit/192kHzInputs: Bluetooth 5.3/USB Type-CBluetoothOutputsStereo RCA, Optical (Toslink)RCA stereo, optical (SPDIF)Wireless Range:Up to 100 feet (30 meters)Up to 100 feet (30 meters)Signal-to-Noise Ratio100dB100dBTHD+N <0.02%<0.02%Crosstalk<70dB>-86dB Frequency Response (±0.5dB)10Hz – 20kHz 1OHz- 20kHz Latency~30msNot IndicatedPower Supply 5V via included USB-C5V via included USBPower Input5V, 200mASV, 200mADimensions3.5 x 3.5 x 1 inches89 x 89 x 26 mm3.5 x 4.0 x1 inches89 x 101.6 x 26 mmWeight1.01 lbs 1.01bsWarranty3 years3 yearsIn the BoxB1 Nextgen Bluetooth Music ReceiverPower adapter with USB C cableRCA audio cableMicrofiber bagSetup guideB1 Bluetooth Music ReceiverPower adapter with detachable cable42-inch RCA cable Microfiber bagSetup Guide

The Bottom Line

It’s not very often that an audio product stays in a line-up for 10 years – but Audioengine makes products that are practical and last. 

The Audioengine B1 fell into that category, but there comes a time when an upgrade is needed. The B1 Next Gen retains everything that was great about the B1, such as its compact design, plug-and-play operation, and overall ease of use. 

However, on the inside, the B1 Next Gen is designed to deliver better sound quality via Bluetooth version 5.3 with Aptx HD Adaptive, a new DAC, and the addition of USB-C connectivity.

With the same price tag as the original B1, if you have an older audio receiver or system that doesn’t already have built-in Bluetooth or wireless streaming, the Audioengine B1 Next Gen is an inexpensive and practical way to add it. 

Pro Tip: You can’t connect the B1 or B1 Next Gen directly to speakers unless you are using powered speakers.

Price & Availability

The Audioengine B1 Next Gen Bluetooth Music Receiver is available now for $189 at Amazon or directly through Audioengine.

Related Reading

NASA’s TESS Discovers Fastest Disintegrating Planet Ever Seen: What You Need to Know

0
NASA

Astronomers have identified the fastest disintegrating exoplanet observed to date, a discovery made possible by NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). The planet BD+05 4868 Ab, located approximately 141 light-years from Earth, is being eroded at an extraordinary rate due to intense bombardment from its host star, BD+05 4868 A. The planet is losing mass equivalent to that of Earth’s moon every million years and is on track to vanish entirely, marking it as a rare find for the scientific community.Insights from the StudyAs reported by space.com, according to findings presented by a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), BD+05 4868 Ab is among the closest disintegrating exoplanets to be observed. Its unique condition provides researchers with a rare opportunity to examine the internal structure of rocky planets as their material is expelled into space. These insights were detailed during the 245th American Astronomical Society meeting in Maryland.Marc Hon, a postdoctoral associate at MIT and leader of the research, highlighted to space.com the significance of this observation, describing the planet’s massive dust trails. These trails extend approximately 9 million kilometres and consist of two distinct sections, formed by varying sizes of dust grains. Hon added that the transit signal caused by this trail blocks 1 percent of the star’s light, lasting 15 hours.Future Research Using JWSTThe research, conducted alongside scientists from Pennsylvania State University, aims to deepen understanding of planetary disintegration. Penn State’s team has previously employed similar techniques to study another disintegrating exoplanet, K2-22b. Jason Wright, a professor of astronomy at Penn State, noted that BD+05 4868 Ab offers an exceptional opportunity due to the brightness of its host star, which is 100 times brighter than those of previously studied disintegrating planets.Efforts are now underway to leverage the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to study BD+05 4868 Ab in greater detail. The findings could illuminate the composition of such planets, offering a groundbreaking perspective on planetary interiors beyond the solar system. 

The best gaming headsets for 2025

0
The best gaming headsets for 2025

Sometimes, the best gaming headset doesn’t need to be a “gaming headset” at all. While many people view these devices as their own niche, they’re ultimately still headphones, just with a boom mic and some fancy branding attached. While the general quality of dedicated headsets has improved over time, they still tend to cost more compared to a good pair of wired headphones (which, yes, still exist). If you need to chat with friends, you can always buy a microphone separately and get superior sound quality there as well.That said, we understand that many people just want the convenience of a headset with a mic built right in. So after testing dozens of contenders over the past couple of years, we’ve rounded up a few commendable gaming headsets and headphones that work well for gaming. As you’ll see, the two aren’t quite the same thing. Whichever way you go, though, all of our picks should make your game time more enjoyable, no matter which platform you use, and whether you play competitively or just for fun.What to look for in good gaming headphonesThe HyperX Cloud Stinger 2. (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)Evaluating headphones is a particularly subjective exercise, so calling one pair the absolute “best” is something of a fool’s errand. At a certain point, whether you’re an audiophile or not, everything becomes a matter of taste. For most, a headphone with a wide soundscape and strong imaging performance — i.e., the ability to position sounds correctly, so you can more precisely tell where footsteps and other game effects are coming from — will provide the most immersive gaming experience, the kind that makes you feel like your head is within a given scene.For that, you want a high-quality pair of open-back headphones. That is to say, an over-ear pair whose ear cups do not completely seal off the ear from air and outside noise. These are inherently terrible at isolating you from external sound and preventing others from hearing what you’re playing, so if you often play games in a noisy environment, their benefits will be blunted. But in a quiet room, the best open-back pairs sound significantly wider and more precise than more common closed-back models.More up for debate is how a good gaming headphone should sound. If you want something that’ll help you in competitive multiplayer games, you may prefer a headphone with a flatter sound signature, which’ll keep a game’s mix from being overly boosted in one direction and is less likely to mask the smaller details of what’s happening around you. A slightly brighter sound, one that pushes the upper frequencies a tad, may also work. Open-back headphones almost never have huge sub-bass, so you rarely have to worry about low-end sounds muddying up the rest of the signature. In this light, the fact that an overwhelming amount of gaming headsets are closed-back and bass-heavy seems counterintuitive.Lots of people love bass, though. And if you don’t really care about competitive play, some extra low-end can add a touch of excitement to action scenes or rousing soundtracks. You still don’t want a pair that boosts the low-end too hard — as many gaming headsets do — but the point is that what makes a pair “immersive” to one person may sound dull to another.Photo by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Open-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 5 – 40,000Hz | Mic: No | Connectivity: Wired | Weight: 345g (without cable) The Beyerdynamic DT 900 Pro X should please most people willing to pay for a capital-N nice pair of headphones for gaming purposes. It localizes sounds accurately and delivers the kind of spacious soundstage expected from a good open-back model. Bass is a little more present here than on many open-back headphones as well. There still isn’t much in the way of deep sub-bass, unsurprisingly, but there’s enough warmth to give stuff like explosions a bit more juice without muddying up the mids. Details in the midrange get the most emphasis overall, but they’re clear, and their forwardness isn’t a bad thing when you’re trying to listen for enemy players in a competitive FPS like Counter-Strike 2 or Apex Legends. The treble isn’t pushed quite as hard, but it’s neither overly recessed nor harsh. All of this helps the DT 900 Pro X sound detailed but not boring. It’s the kind of sound that plays nice whether you’re trying to win a multiplayer game or take in a more cinematic single-player story. And when you’re not gaming, you get an enjoyable profile for music. The whole thing is built well, too. The DT 900 Pro X will clamp down slightly harder than average if you have a large head, but it balances its weight well, and its wonderfully soft velour earpads go a long way toward keeping the pair comfortable over hours-long gaming sessions. It comes with two detachable cables, including a three-meter option that’s convenient if you sit far from your PC. It can’t fold up, though. Like all open-back headphones, the DT 900 Pro X leak game audio and let in lots of noise, so it’s not great on the go. Clearly, if you can afford to upgrade to an ultra-premium pair like Sennheiser’s HD 800 S, you’ll get more space and true-to-life detail. But for a relatively attainable $250 to $300, the DT 900 Pro X should satisfy. ProsImmersive, detailed sound with pleasing bassWell-built with soft ear cushionsConsLeaks and lets in outside noise, by designLacking in deep sub-bass, like most open-back headphones$250 at AmazonPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Open-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 6 – 38,000Hz | Mic: No | Connectivity: Wired | Weight: 280g If you’d rather not spend as much, the Sennheiser HD 560S is another excellent open-back headphone that’s often available for less than $200. Like the DT 900 Pro X, it has a wide soundstage that makes it easier to feel immersed in a given game. Its signature is slightly more neutral on the whole, so you won’t feel like you’re missing any part of what’s happening, and it retrieves a lovely amount of treble and midrange detail. There’s less bass power for explosions, though. And the treble, while more present here than on Beyerdynamic’s pair, can sound piercing at times. Imaging isn’t quite as nuanced either, though it’s far from poor. The HD560S’ design is plenty comfortable to wear for extended periods. It doesn’t clamp down too hard on those with big heads (like yours truly), and its velour earpads hug the ears softly. The included cable is removable, too. The plastic frame doesn’t feel as sturdy or premium as the DT 900 Pro X, however, so you won’t want to chuck it around haphazardly. It won’t isolate much noise either, nor will it prevent others from hearing what you’re playing. Nevertheless, the HD 560S is a pleasure, and a great value. ProsImpressively balanced soundComfortableGreat value for those who prioritize audio qualityConsSlightly hot in treble rangeLeaks and lets in outside noise, by designDoesn’t have the sturdiest build quality$229 at AmazonPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Open-back (on-ear) | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 15 – 25,000Hz | Mic: No | Connectivity: Wired | Weight: 43g If you can’t spend more than $50, it’s still hard to top the Koss KSC75. It costs $20, but judging purely on audio quality, it’s better than some headphones priced closer to $100. This pair is very obviously devoid of deep bass, so you won’t get that full-bodied oomph from in-game effects. You also won’t hear all the intricate details you’d pick up with the pricier headphones above. But it locates sounds accurately, and its open design delivers a real sense of width. It’s a superb value for competitive play. The catch is that it’s built like a set of free airline headphones. The KSC75 has an odd clip-on design that is lightweight but won’t be a comfortable fit for everyone. It certainly looks like it costs $20, though Koss backs it with a lifetime warranty that essentially lets you get endless replacements for $9 each. Even if the KSC75 are pushing 20 years old, its relatively balanced sound remains particularly well-suited for gaming. ProsThe best-sounding headphones $20 can buyLightweightConsClip-on design definitely not for everyoneFeels cheap, because it is$20 at AdoramaPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Open-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 20 – 40,000Hz | Mic: Yes, detachable | Connectivity: 2.4GHz (PS5, PC, Switch), Bluetooth 5.2 (AAC, SBC), 3.5mm | Weight: 301g If you do want a dedicated gaming headset with a built-in mic, we love the Turtle Beach Atlas Air. It’s a bit of a rarity: a wireless model with an open-back design. It sounds much wider, airier and more natural than the vast majority of its peers as a result, creating the sensation that your game is happening around you instead of feeling confined in your head. It’s also better than most at positioning in-game effects in the right places. The Atlas Air has a mostly flat audio profile by default, with a jump in the treble that lends extra crispness to things like cymbals. Like most open-back pairs, it’s fairly weak in the low-bass region, so gunfire and EDM lack the kind of muscle you’d get with good closed-backs. The DT 900 Pro X still sounds more dynamic, with more detail in the mids and stronger bass that makes footsteps and explosions more intimate. That said, the Atlas Air holds its own surprisingly well. It’s about as spacious, and what bass is here doesn’t come off as blobby. It’s an easygoing listen, and the greater sense of spatial awareness provided by its design makes a real difference whether you’re listening for enemies in Counter-Strike 2 or basking in a giant boss battle in Final Fantasy XVI. Going from a pair like this to a traditional headset often makes it sound like a chunk of the world has been lopped off. The Atlas Air is also exceptionally comfortable. Its ear cups are generously padded with light memory foam and covered in a soft cloth material; they give plenty of room for larger ears to breathe, without trapping too much heat. The suspension-style headband doesn’t allow much in the way of manual adjustments, but it’s extremely flexible, so those with especially large heads can still pop the headphones on with little struggle. The design as a whole is lightweight at 0.66 pounds, and it’s gentle about clamping down on the sides of your head. Put it all together and you get a headset that’s a breeze to wear for hours at a time. All of its controls — including a big volume dial that circles the left ear cup — are easily accessible beyond that. Our chief complaint is that the design is almost entirely plastic, so it doesn’t quite feel like a $180 device to the touch. It’s also kind of… ugly, to be honest. None of that is a big deal once you have it on, however, and we haven’t noticed any creaking or looseness to the frame after several months of testing. The Atlas Air’s detachable boom mic is perfectly fine. You wouldn’t want to use it for podcasting, as it robs a good chunk of bass from your voice, but you’ll still come through clearly in a noisy room, with no harsh sibilance to “ess” sounds. The mic itself is sufficiently flexible, and you simply flip it up to mute it, which is always convenient. The headset works with PC, PS5 or a docked Nintendo Switch through its USB dongle, plus it supports Bluetooth for mobile devices and the Switch’s handheld mode. You can’t pipe through audio from two connections at the same time, but you can at least switch between the two fairly quickly using a button on the left ear cup. While there’s no support for Xbox’s wireless protocol, you can also use the headset passively (i.e., without relying on battery power) with an included 3.5mm cable with its own inline volume dial. If you’re an Xbox player and don’t mind using a cable, we’d still consider the Atlas Air our top recommendation. Without the wire, Turtle Beach says the device can last up to 50 hours, though we’ve been able to squeeze another five to 10 hours out at moderate volumes. It’s far from the longest-lasting pair we’ve tested, but this means it can likely go for a week or two before it needs a charge. The main trade-offs with the Atlas Air are the same ones noted above: Because they’re open-back, they let in and leak tons of noise. If you don’t play in a reasonably quiet environment, consider our next pick. We also had a driver issue that prevented us from connecting to PC upon first receiving the headset, but a software update quickly fixed that and we haven’t had any hiccups or stutters since. In general, Turtle Beach’s Swarm II app is fairly straightforward, offering a custom EQ tool, game/chat mix, mic settings and the like. ProsMore open, natural and immersive sound than most gaming headsetsSupremely comfortableMultiple connection modesDecent flip-up micConsLeaks and lets in outside noise, by designLacks deep sub-bass, like most open-back headphonesNot the most premium or handsome design$139 at AmazonPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Closed-back | Driver: Planar magnetic | Frequency response: 10 – 50,000Hz | Mic: Yes, detachable | Connectivity: 2.4GHz, Bluetooth 5.3 (LDAC, LE Audio, LC3, LC3plus, AAC, SBC), 3.5mm, USB-C digital audio (optional), Xbox Wireless (optional) | Weight: 490g If you’re willing to pay extra for a premium gaming headset with a more isolating closed-back design, get the Audeze Maxwell. At $299 for a PS5 model or $329 for an Xbox model, it’s not cheap, but it’s one of the few dedicated gaming headsets we’ve used whose audio quality holds up next to the better “normal” wireless headphones on the market. The Maxwell’s default signature is like a more refined version of the common “gaming headset” sound. Bass is impactful but well-controlled, while highs are crisp but not sharp. There’s a bit of extra energy in the upper-mids, but it’s not overwhelming, and the headset’s planar-magnetic drivers do well to reproduce smaller intricacies throughout. It still can’t provide the immersive width and precise imaging of our open-back picks, the Atlas Air included, but the Maxwell sounds unusually textured, balanced and intimate compared to other wireless gaming headsets. While it lacks the airiness of the Turtle Beach headset, the punchier low-end makes things like footsteps more easily identifiable in games. If you don’t like the out-of-the-box profile, Audeze’s app also includes a number of tasteful EQ presets. Along those lines, the Maxwell’s detachable boom mic is a standout. It does a phenomenal job of muting background noise, and while your voice will lose some air, it’ll sound clearer and fuller here than on most wireless headsets we’ve tested. The Maxwell is very much on the bulky side, it leaks sound at higher volumes, and its steel headband uses an odd suspension mechanism that’s effectively impossible to adjust without taking the headset off. In general, though, its design feels substantial. The squishy, heavily padded ear cups can make your ears feel warm, but they keep the headset comfortable and isolate a fair amount of outside noise. The essential controls are built into the left earcup, and the device can connect over Bluetooth or a 3.5mm cable in addition to a USB-C wireless dongle. You can even connect to two devices at once, one over the dongle and another over Bluetooth, though you can’t stream audio from both sources simultaneously. The headset also needs to be powered on in order to play music over a cable. Audeze rates the Maxwell’s battery life at roughly 80 hours, which is great and has generally held true in our testing. You’ll get a bit less if you play at high volumes or use features like Bluetooth or sidetone heavily, though. ProsWonderfully textured audio qualityGood mic performance80-hour battery life$299 at B&H PhotoPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Open-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 20 – 20,000Hz | Mic: Yes, not detachable | Connectivity: Wired | Weight: 369g (without cable) If you’d prefer to save some cash and buy a decent wired gaming headset, consider the Astro A40 TR. It’s another open-back pair that sounds more spacious than most traditional gaming headsets and generally locates in-game effects accurately. Its sound signature emphasizes the bass, which gives explosions a smooth and satisfying thump, but it doesn’t overdo the low-end the way many of its peers do. The A40’s audio quality is still a step behind the DT 900 Pro X, HD 560S and Atlas Air, especially for online shooters. Next to those headphones, its veiled treble and pushed upper-bass/low-mids can blunt footsteps and other fine details. Its soundstage is narrower by comparison as well. But it’s better balanced than most gaming headsets, especially those in its price range. It does well to envelop you in whatever’s happening onscreen. Comfort shouldn’t be an issue, either. The A40 is on the bulkier side, but its weight is evenly distributed, and it doesn’t clamp down overly hard. The fuzzy earpads are soft and breathable, while the ear cups are roomy enough to fit larger ears. The headset has the usual open-back shortcomings, though, as it leaks a bunch of sound and blocks almost zero outside noise. The mostly-plastic design looks “gamer-y” and lacks built-in volume controls, too. Nobody would call it “premium.” Still, it’s not flimsy. The A40’s mic, meanwhile, is just OK. It picks up background noises while you chat and makes voices sound somewhat muffled. It’s serviceable, but you’d buy the A40 for its sound quality (and relative value) first. The mic isn’t detachable either, but you can easily flip it up and out of the way. The A40 has been around for several years now, but its price has come down from $150 to a more reasonable $130 in that time. Astro sells an optional DAC with extra controls for $130, but at that price we’d strongly advise buying one of our other picks instead. ProsMore spacious sound than most dedicated gaming headsetsComfortableSolid valueConsMic performance is just OKDesign is far from premiumTreble is underemphasized$100 at AmazonPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetEnclosure: Closed-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 10 – 28,000Hz | Mic: Yes, not detachable | Connectivity: Wired | Weight: 275g You won’t find a good open-back gaming headset for less than $50, so if you’re on a tight budget and need a built-in mic, you’ll have to compromise on sound quality. With that in mind, the HyperX Cloud Stinger 2 is a decent buy for $40 or so. It gets the comfort part right, as its pleather ear cups don’t clamp down hard and have enough soft padding where it counts. Its mic makes voices sound relatively clear and accurate as well. In fact, the mic is a clear step up over the Astro A40’s, though it’s not detachable. The Cloud Stinger 2 has a V-shaped sound signature, which is to say it exaggerates the bass and treble while recessing the mids. It’s not bad for what it is, and it’ll definitely give action scenes a heavy dose of boom. But the upper-bass is bumped to the point where it may get tiring over time, and you lose some of the fine details you’d hear on our other picks. Since this is a cheap closed-back headset, the Cloud Stinger 2 doesn’t sound nearly as wide as the pairs above, nor is it as nuanced about positioning sounds accurately. All of that makes it less than ideal for competitive games, though it can still sound “fun” with many other titles. Beyond that, the plastic design feels cheapish. Its cable isn’t removable, and it doesn’t block much outside noise despite having a closed-back design. Nevertheless, you have to pick your battles in this price range. The Cloud Stinger 2 is flawed, but it does enough well to be a good headset for certain budget-conscious buyers. ProsStrong valueComfortableSolid mic performanceConsBoomy sound isn’t idealFeels cheapishPoor noise isolation for a closed-back headset$40 at AmazonPhoto by Jeff Dunn / EngadgetThe Astro A50 X costs an eye-watering $380, so we can’t reasonably recommend it to most people. However, if you can stomach the price, this is a uniquely convenient wireless headset for hardcore gamers who own a PS5, Xbox Series X/S and gaming PC. That’s mainly due to its included charging dock, which serves as a unified A/V station for those three platforms. By chaining HDMI and USB cables from a PS5, Xbox and/or PC to the A50 X’s base station, you can connect the headset to all three devices simultaneously. From there, you can swap to your active machine just by pressing a button on the right earcup. This is a pain to set up: As shown in Logitech’s 12-minute (!) video tutorial, connecting both consoles and a PC requires seven different cables, a few of which aren’t in the box, plus some futzing around in each system’s menus. It’s not totally seamless once everything’s up and running, either: We had to manually change video signals when switching from a PC to a console (though not when doing the inverse) and manually change our PC’s audio output when we wanted to listen through desktop speakers. All of this requires you to keep your gaming hardware in the same area, too. But for the most part, the A50 X is the most practical wireless headset we’ve tested for multi-console setups. Instead of needing two headsets for Xbox and PS5/PC, or having to reconnect one headset each time you change consoles, all you have to do is take the A50 X off its dock, turn it on and select the platform you want to use. A small LED display on the dock will show the active connection, and the headset will automatically play the correct audio source. With a PS5 and Xbox, it’ll automatically swap video. So long as you use HDMI 2.1 cables, the base station can pass-through 4K 120Hz HDR video to the two consoles, with support for VRR and ALLM. You can also connect the A50 X to a Switch or mobile device via Bluetooth — though you need to be within range of the base station for that to work, and you don’t get the same fast-switching functionality. All these connectivity tricks wouldn’t mean much if the A50 X was a shoddy headset, but thankfully, it’s not. It’s among the better-sounding wireless headsets we’ve used; it’s not “$380 good,” but it’s dynamic, with rich, relatively nuanced bass and a clean midrange. Explosions and gunshots have a good crunch without sounding overly thick, and it’s generally accurate at locating footsteps and nearby effects. The Audeze Maxwell is still a level above, however; the A50 X has a darker tilt by comparison, so it captures less detail in the treble range and feels more boxed-in. It also can’t match the wider, more enveloping soundstage of our open-back picks. Still, most people will be happy with it, and you can customize its EQ curve to an extent through Logitech’s G Hub software. The A50 X’s design is like a nicer version of the A40. It’s largely plastic, but it feels sturdy. The fuzzy, fabric-covered foam on its earpads and headband is soft and breathable, and while the headset isn’t super light at 0.8 pounds, it distributes its weight in a way that feels comfortable yet secure. You can also adjust your game-to-chat audio mix right from an earcup. It doesn’t isolate outside noise very well, though, and its boom mic is permanently attached. Its battery life is mediocre as well — Astro rates it at up to 24 hours at moderate volumes — but since the headset is designed to sit on its dock when it’s not in use, that’s not a serious issue. The mic, meanwhile, is one of the very best we’ve used any gaming headset, wired or wireless. Voices sound cleaner and more natural than they do with the Maxwell, and background noise is largely kept in check. Enclosure: Closed-back | Driver: Dynamic | Frequency response: 60 – 20,000Hz | Mic: Yes, not detachable | Connectivity: HDMI audio, USB audio, Bluetooth | Weight: 363g ProsClosest thing to a truly universal wireless gaming headsetExcellent mic performanceGood audio qualityConsWildly expensiveRequires a ton of cables to fully set upNo analog audio support$380 at LogitechOther gaming headsets we testedThe PlayStation Pulse Elite. (Jeff Dunn for Engadget)Note: This is a selection of noteworthy gaming headsets and headphones we’ve put through their paces, not a comprehensive list of everything we’ve ever tried.PlayStation Pulse Elite (and Pulse Explore)The PlayStation Pulse Elite is a reasonable alternative to the Turtle Beach Atlas Air for PS5 owners, as it allows you to change volume, swap between different EQ presets, adjust the game-to-chat mix and mute the mic right from the console’s native UI. It’s similar to the way AirPods integrate with iPhones. This pair also lets you connect to a second device over Bluetooth at the same time, and the planar magnetic drivers — a rarity for $150 headphones — do a decent job of reproducing smaller details. The sound profile as a whole is narrower and more uneven in the bass and treble than the Atlas Air, however, while the all-plastic design is comfortable but flimsy-feeling. It also doesn’t do much to block outside noise, despite being closed-back, and the control buttons are awkward to reach.We also tested the in-ear version of these headphones, the PlayStation Pulse Explore, but found it too uncomfortable to wear over extended sessions. That one is limited to roughly five hours of battery life, too.Astro A50 (Gen 5)The Astro A50 (Gen 5) is effectively the same headset as the A50X, just without any HDMI ports on its base station. It costs $80 less, so it’s a worthy alternative to the Audeze Maxwell if you mainly play on one platform and want a superior microphone. But the ability to automatically switch between consoles is the thing that makes the A50X worth buying in the first place, so that convenience is still worth paying for if you game on multiple devices.The Corsair Virtuoso Pro. (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)Corsair Virtuoso ProThe $200 Corsair Virtuoso Pro is another one of the few dedicated gaming headsets with an open-back design. It has a relatively dark sound with mostly underemphasized treble and elevated upper-bass, though the highs are clearer here than they are on the Astro A40, and it still delivers a wider soundstage than most gaming headsets. We preferred this signature over Astro’s pair with some games, though in others it felt less balanced. The Virtuoso Pro’s mic is decidedly less muffled than the A40’s but still sounds fairly thin, so it’s merely decent compared to the wider headset market. Its headband adjustment mechanism feels cheap, too, and you can’t detach the mic without swapping cables out entirely. Its round, breathable ear cups and manageable weight do make it easy to wear, though, and it comes with a sturdy travel case for protection. Ultimately, it’s a decent buy, but it’s hard to justify over the more featured and easier-sounding Atlas Air.HyperX Cloud Alpha WirelessThe HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless can last well over 300 hours at moderate volumes, which is remarkable and by far the best of any wireless model we’ve tested. It’s light and not too snug on the head, and its powerful bass lends a real sense of excitement to in-game action. But it blunts more detail than the Atlas Air, Maxwell and A50 X, and its mic isn’t as good. Several users have also reported latency issues when using the headset with HyperX’s Ngenuity software, and there’s no Xbox, Bluetooth or wired audio support. Still, if battery life is paramount, you may be able to look past all of that.The HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless. (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)Logitech G Pro X 2 LightspeedIf the Audeze Maxwell is out of stock, the Logitech G Pro X 2 Lightspeed is another quality wireless headset worth considering. It sounds better than the HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless, with satisfying but more controlled bass and more accurate mids, and it’s lighter on the head than the Maxwell. Logitech rates its battery life at 50 hours, but we found it to last much longer at moderate volumes. However, similar to the Astro A50 X, a dip in the treble makes it sound darker and more veiled than the Maxwell, and it doesn’t have any HDMI-switching tricks to fall back on. Its mic also sounds less natural than those of the Maxwell, A50 X and Cloud Alpha Wireless. Plus, while it can connect over a USB dongle, Bluetooth or a 3.5mm cable, it can’t pair to two devices at once like Audeze’s and Astro’s pairs. Our biggest issue is the price: Value-wise, it’s in something of a no man’s land at its MSRP of $250. It’s a fine choice if it dips below $200, though.Razer BlackShark V2 ProThe wireless Razer BlackShark V2 Pro is tremendously comfortable and has a good mic, but its boomy sound is less refined and detailed than the Audeze Maxwell. As a closed-back headset, it also lacks the width of the Atlas Air. There’s no support for wired audio either.Logitech G535 LightspeedThe Logitech G535 is an impressively light (0.52 pounds) and comfy wireless headset that’s often available for $100 or less. It has a relatively neutral sound signature: not flat, but not beholden to big, thumping bass. It can make details in the mids sound thin, and if anything it could use a little more sub-bass, but it’s an agreeable listen overall. However, its mic isn’t especially full, and its 35-or-so-hour battery life is a significant drop from our top recommendations. It doesn’t work with Xbox’s wireless protocol or Bluetooth either, and it forces you to crank the volume to reach a listenable level. But if you don’t want to spend a ton on a wireless headset, it’s a fine value.The Logitech G535 Lightspeed. (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7XXbox owners who want a more affordable wireless headset than the Audeze Maxwell could do worse than the SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7X. It’s another bass-forward pair, and its mic is comparable to that of the Cloud Alpha Wireless. It offers multiple connectivity options, including Bluetooth and a 3.5mm cable. While it’s marketed for Xbox, it can also connect to PCs and PS5s. Its 30-ish-hour battery life is well short of the Maxwell and Cloud Alpha Wireless, however, and its uneven treble can cause things like in-game dialogue to sound masked in certain titles.HyperX Cloud AlphaThe wired HyperX Cloud Alpha often goes for $80 or less, and at that price it’s a decent middle ground between the Cloud Stinger 2 and Astro A40 if you really want a closed-back gaming headset. It’s old, but its plush earpads and headband are comfy, and its detachable mic, while not superb, is still better than the one on the A40. Its treble is underemphasized, however, and again it sounds more “in your head” than Astro’s pair.SteelSeries Arctis Nova ProThe SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro is comfortable and has a noticeably clearer mic than the Astro A40. It also comes with a useful DAC that makes it easy to adjust the headset’s EQ and game-to-chat mix on the fly. However, its closed-back design can’t provide the same enveloping sense of width, and its default sound can sound piercing in the treble. Like the Virtuoso Pro, it’s also a bit too pricey, typically hovering in the $200 to $220 range.SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro WirelessThe SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless is largely similar to its wired counterpart but adds a passable level of active noise cancellation. Being able to hot-swap battery packs and connect to multiple devices at once is also nice. It’s not as convenient for multi-console play as the Astro A50 X, though, and it usually costs more than the Audeze Maxwell, which sounds better, has a superior mic and lasts longer on a charge.The Beyerdynamic MMX 200 (left) and HyperX Cloud III Wireless (right). (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)Beyerdynamic MMX 200The wireless Beyerdynamic MMX 200 locates in-game effects accurately, feels sturdy and has a great boom mic, but it sounds less articulate than the Audeze Maxwell, with heavily exaggerated bass and recessed lower-mids. There’s no game-to-chat mix or custom EQ tools, which is tough for a $250 headset, and its 35-hour battery life is unremarkable. We also found its sweat-inducing ear cushions and headband to clamp down too tight for comfort. However, the built-in transparency mode is nice and the tight fit does a good job of isolating outside noise.Beyerdynamic MMX 300 ProThere’s nothing particularly bad about the Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro: It uses the same drivers as the DT 900 Pro X, its velour earpads are comfy and its mic works well. It’s just hard to recommend spending $300 on a wired-only headset when the Audeze Maxwell offers wireless functionality and similarly excellent sound — with slightly less spiky treble and more even bass — for the same price. The MMX 300 Pro’s mic isn’t detachable either, and the closed-back design keeps it from sounding as wide as the DT 900 Pro X.HyperX Cloud III WirelessThe HyperX Cloud III Wireless is comfy and can last up to 120 hours per charge but sounds less dynamic than the older Cloud Alpha Wireless, with weaker bass response. Like that pair, it also lacks a 3.5mm jack, Bluetooth audio support and Xbox compatibility. The Cloud Alpha Wireless still gets nearly three times the battery life, too, so it remains a better buy if you want a wireless headset for PC or PS5 in the $150 range.Sennheiser HD 490 ProThe Sennheiser HD 490 Pro are studio-focused open-back headphones that also work well for gaming. They come with two sets of ear pads, one that slightly elevates the bass and another that bumps the midrange, though they deliver impressive width and detail either way without pushing too hard in one direction. They’re a pleasure to wear over long stretches, both lighter than the DT 900 Pro X and less stiff than the HD 560S. That said, they cost $400 and their sound profile is more of a nice alternative to our top picks than something clearly more natural or resolving. Most people don’t need to pay the premium.Recent updatesJanuary 2025: We’ve looked over this guide to ensure our picks are still accurate and added notes on a few more headsets we’ve recently tested, including the PlayStation Pulse Elite, Astro A50 (Gen 5) and Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro.November 2024: We’ve updated this guide with a new recommendation for the best dedicated gaming headset, the Turtle Beach Atlas Air, and reorganized our picks accordingly. We’ve also added notes on other gaming-friendly headphones we’ve tested, including the Sennheiser HD 490 Pro and Razer BlackShark V2 Pro, and removed a couple of write-ups on headsets that are no longer available.

Quite a lot of Brits have never heard of data centers

0
Samsung wants to build its first AI data center as it seeks to crack $1 billion dollar annual sales in cloud services


Half of Brits aren’t even familiar with data centers, report findsThree in five know they play a role in hybrid workFurther education could increase public trust in data centersDespite efforts to propel the country’s artificial intelligence capabilities, new research from Telehouse has revealed more than half (51%) of Brits aren’t even familiar with the term ‘data center.’Even the people who have heard of data centers aren’t necessarily clued up on the role they play in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and even cloud storage.Two in three (67%) don’t understand the role date centers play, and two in five (42%) are unaware of the scale of people, applications and data supported by such campuses.British citizens aren’t clued up on data centersThe trend paints a troubling picture for Britain’s intentions to become an AI leader – Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer wants to make the UK a global leader in artificial intelligence.In 2024, data centers became classified as Critical National Infrastructure, giving them extra protections and monitoring, and recent years have seen an increase in government focus on data centers, coinciding with AI investments and other plans to expand digital infrastructure. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently approved a £670 million data center project in Buckinghamshire which will occupy land on a green belt.However, although two in three (59%) of the 2,000 UK consumers surveyed acknowledged that data centers are important for remote working, 19% are unsure how the facilities actually support their remote work.“We realise there’s a significant knowledge gap regarding data centres and their impact on digital lives,” noted Telehouse Europe EVP and GM Mark Pestridge.Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!Pestridge hopes education around data centers will bridge the knowledge divide and therefore increase public trust in digital infrastructure.You might also like